(UPDATE 09.27.10: I have been meaning to tell you, just a couple of days after I posted my unusually high “alexa” numbers for Washington, D.C., “alexa” stopped posting all of my domestic numbers.)
(UPDATE 08.15.10: New “alexa” numbers posted on the bottom!)
I told you from the very beginning, I was right.
Almost 2 (two) years ago, having just begun to figure out what at that time I mostly only still ‘felt’ was wrong with the political process surrounding the 2008 election, I set up this technologically challenged blog so as to have a centralized location to publicly distribute my findings. No doubt, those of you familiar with “jbjd” have deduced, I am not very computer savvy. But even without the ‘bells and whistles’ of other blogs which are much more popular, when it comes to understanding that massive election fraud enabled the Democratic National Committee Services Corporation to steal the 2008 Presidential election for Barack Obama; work produced on the technically challenged “jbjd” has made this the ‘go to’ site. And now, thanks to “alexa,” I can prove it.
I recently became acquainted with “alexa,” a sort of “Nielson” of the internet, which tracks and compares the viewership of web sites, posting such criteria as clicks, length of time on site, and demographics of viewing audience. What a riot. Not surprisingly given my low profile – for example, I am not linked to any search engines (?) or social networking – according to alexa, my ranking in the U.S. hovers at around 990,000. Indeed, I have the lowest ranking of all of the sites I visit. But guess where is the one place “alexa” points out I maintain “relatively good traffic rank”? Washington, D.C.!
Yep; even blogs with much better overall numbers than mine, are not nearly as popular in our nation’s capital. Take, for example, one of my favorite blogs, Afrocity. (Find her link in my blogroll.) Like me, she generally posts a substantial article every few days. Her alexa rank is 448,000. That is, her blog is twice as popular as mine. alexa reports she has “relatively good traffic rank” in NYC: 208,000. My “relatively good traffic rank” in Washington: 42,000. In other words, the ratio between Afrocity’s overall U.S. rank and her rank in NYC, where she has “relatively good traffic” is 2:1. The ratio between my national rank and my rank in D.C. is approximately 23:1!
Here’s another way to look at the popularity of “jbjd” in D.C. According to alexa, my readers are mostly women, over the age of 40, with post-graduate degrees, and incomes over $100,000. The demographics of Washington generally mirror those of the rest of the country. (There are 2 (two) exceptions. Whites comprise 33% of the District population versus 66% nationally; and Blacks are 55% versus 13% for the country. http://www.fedstats.gov/qf/states/11000.html But alexa did not stratify my statistics according to race.) In other words, there isn’t a surplus of women over 40 with post-graduate degrees earning $100,000 which would account for the popularity of “jbjd” in that one market.
So, who in D.C. do you suppose is reading “jbjd”? (This is a rhetorical question.)
Look at this partial list of the work I have undertaken and published on this blog in relation to Mr. Obama’s fraudulent election.
•I learned that laws in some states require the candidate to be qualified for office to appear on the ballot. Members of the D party swore to state election officials in these ‘applicable’ states Barack Obama was qualified for office to get those officials to print his name on the ballot. But hundreds of thousands of citizens unsuccessfully seeking out Mr. Obama’s vital records confirmed to me, based on documents available in the public record, none of these D’s could have ascertained beforehand the candidate was Constitutionally eligible for the job. Swearing he was Constitutionally qualified for office without first ascertaining, for example, he is a natural born citizen, just to get his name printed on the ballot is criminal election fraud.
I figured out we could go after the law breakers by filing citizen complaints of election fraud to state A’sG in these applicable states.
First, with the help of “jbjd” readers, we researched state laws so as to identify those applicable states. Then, we obtained from state officials in these states any documents that were submitted by D officials to Certify Mr. Obama’s nomination and, depending on who had submitted those Certifications, contacted those D officials to request the documents that were the basis for their Certification. When they failed to produce the requested documentation – and they always failed to produce the requested documentation – I drafted state-specific citizen complaints of election fraud to state A’sG, and posted these for downloading. So far, hundreds of citizens in 6 (six) states already identified have downloaded and sent these complaints.
•I observed that representatives of Mr. Obama were pressuring delegates pledged to Hillary Clinton to commit to switching their allegiance to him, in advance of the August 2008 nominating convention. Through research, I found that laws in some states require delegates pledged to one candidate versus another through state primary or caucus contests, to follow the candidate voters elected them to represent, through at least the first roll call at the party’s nominating convention. (I dubbed these “vote binding states.”) (In researching these laws I found the ballot eligibility laws that became the basis for the citizen complaints of election fraud.) I reasoned in these vote binding states, pressuring these delegates to change their votes was soliciting them to break the law!
I researched all 50 states and found 13 (thirteen) such vote binding states, including California. Then, I drafted state specific letters to the A’sG of those states, in advance of the Convention, complaining of the criminal conduct carried out by Mr. Obama’s representatives, trying to ‘turn’ Ms. Clinton’s pledged delegates in advance of the Convention. In at least one state (GA), the AG wrote to remind pledged delegates to obey the state’s vote binding law.
•(The only major fraud I have yet to present is the story of how the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, acting in the civilian role of Chair of the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Nominating Convention artfully suppressed votes from Clinton pledged delegates from vote binding states at the Convention, as the final act in the conspiracy to deprive her of the Presidential nomination.)
•(In addition, throughout these 2 years, I exposed several deceptive practices. For example, I showed the online COLB was merely a paid political advertisement under the U.S. Code; that the ‘contemporaneous newspaper birth announcement’ was only a ghost image pilfered from an anonymous internet poster; and that Dreams from my Father was likely authored by Bill Ayers.)
The fact that postings like these appear on “jbjd” must explain why people in Washington are watching. Because here’s a sample of the stories I left out.
I have promoted no action with respect to grand juries; or Mandamus; or the quo’s, warranto or tam. I have published no statements from ‘witnesses’ to a Kenyan birth or a Kenyan birth document, or neighbors in HI. I have posted no interviews with ex-workers from the HI Department of Health; or with ex-students from Columbia; or anyone’s ex-lover. I haven’t blamed the results of the 2008 election on the rigged caucuses; or the acquiescing MSM; or Muslims or the Jews. All topics that have made other blogs more popular than mine in places ‘outside the Beltway.’
So, you see, they are reading me in D.C. because whether identifying the problem with the 2008 election cycle; or formulating redress; or proposing preventive strategies, I have been writing about them. The same people who stole the 2008 election. And they are curious as to what aspect of the massive fraud they perpetrated I am going to detect and expose next. (For example, I just posted a comprehensive article on the frantic push to forestall new state legislation that could require Electors to only vote for a President who is Constitutionally eligible for the job, by passing the National Popular Vote in advance of the 2012 general election. And while the NPVI will not eliminate Electors, it will certainly circumvent their Constitutional role.) But even though they are reading; they are not too worried. See, unfortunately for those of us working to preserve the essential nature and legal construct of our Constitutional Republic; these D.C. readers know they are safe from the threat of exposure laid out on my blog just as long as the ‘cure’ I prescribe remains dependent on the work of citizens acting as individuals; and on their individual donations to support my work. Because for whatever reason, a handful of would be ‘saviors’ have managed to sidetrack millions of citizens into believing, only the agendas they propose can cure the problems they claim ail our Republic. For the price of a court filing; or a candidate ballot registration fee; or a bus ticket to Washington (instead of, for example, to the state capital building which houses the office of the AG refusing to investigate the charges of election fraud lodged in those citizen complaints).
Judging by my viewing audience, the people in Washington, D.C. know better what will work to fix what’s wrong with the electoral process.
Meanwhile, as I reported in a special fundraising appeal posted in the sidebar on July 27, my computer caught a virus. As a result, some of my work is now quarantined ‘over there,’ while I was able to sneak in ‘over here’ as my “Guest.” This means, before I can continue the work of de-constructing our electoral system for our mutual benefit; and answering your questions, and drafting your documents, I need funds to pay for an overhaul of my trusty old computer. But in the 5 (five) days since I posted that appeal, only 2 (two) readers even ‘clicked’ on the PayPal button. And neither of them actually contributed funds to the blog.
So, why is it that the people in Washington who arguably have a vested interest in my not unraveling the mess they created, flock to this blog? But the people for whom I created this blog, those citizens frustrated because they did not know how to quantify what went wrong with the electoral process or, how to fix it once they did; refuse to support this blog notwithstanding it provides the product that satisfies those consumer needs?
I understand why readers in D.C. might only come here to look at the goods. Or why my efforts are largely ignored by the ‘movement gurus’ whose latest greatest gambit they assure you for a price paid to them will return to you the Republic that was ‘stolen’ in the last general election. But the rest of you, those who, armed with the knowledge you gain from the materials posted here, not only confidently convey what you have learned to your family and friends but also authoritatively petition our government officials to start living up to their oaths of office; need to start putting your money where your mouth is.
(UPDATE 08.15.10: New “alexa” numbers!)
I posted the article, A COUP, THROUGH and THROUGH (1 of 3), the series detailing the coup pulled off at the 2008 DNC nominating convention, and saw a huge increase in hits on the blog. In addition, I was cross-posted on NoQuarter, whose blog boasts a significantly higher alexa score, both international and domestic, than mine. I checked my “alexa” score this morning. You can imagine how surprised I was to see the following image:
Yep; not only are my international numbers going down, but also my domestic viewership has disappeared, completely, including D.C. I interpret this to mean, I must be doing something right.