I am bumping this up because I want people to read the comments from activist citizens, and my responses. For example, here is my response to the copy of a letter I received from rlqretired, which he had sent to his elected officials in FL.
rlqretired: You wrote, “The DNC document submitted to our Secretary of State here in Florida says only that Obama and Biden are their nominees. It says nothing about them having been found eligible…” But know this: no candidate for POTUS can be legally qualified to serve under DNC rules unless he is Constitutionally eligible for the job. http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/2008delegateselectionrules.pdf (It’s on page 14.) Plus, under HI law, the Party must actually certify the candidate is Constitutionally eligible for the job. (Seems redundant, huh, given those pesky DNC Rules.) Here is the Certificate the D Party sent to HI elections officials. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9656064/DNC-Obama-Hawaii-Cert-2008 So, now you have DNC rules saying the nominee for POTUS must be eligible for the job; and a DNC Certificate swearing he is eligible for the job. But so far, no one from the D Party will say, on what basis anyone determined he was eligible for the job. Sounds like fraud (on the voters of the great state of FL) to me. Good luck. Let me know if there is anything else you need. ADMINISTRATOR
Maybe rlqretired’s letter will give other people ideas. And if you want me to review any document before you send this to your elected officials, please, send it here. All comments are in moderation and so, if you do not want these letters posted, just let me know. Note, I delete identifying information before posting.
Finally, let me repeat what I have been saying now for months: stop trying to prove BO is not a NBC. Verifying the Constitutional eligibility of the nominee for POTUS from the major political party before allowing our state elections officials to enter his name on our general elections ballots was never our job; we sub-contracted that job to the major political party. And, in the case of the Democratic Party, they refuse to establish, they did their jobs.
For example, if we live in a state that enacted laws saying the candidate for POTUS from the major political party must be eligible for the job; we trusted that, by naming BO their nominee, the Democratic Party was implicitly warrantying, he is eligible for the job. If we enacted laws allowing the nominee from the Party to automatically be entered onto our general election ballots, we were implicitly saying, we trusted, the Party had lived up to Party rules and verified his Constitutional eligibility. However, when we asked the Party to provide some evidence they subjected BO to such verification, they ignored us. And this is what I hope your complaint to state officials is all about. That is, by requiring that the Party Certify the name of its nominee to elections officials in order to get the name printed onto the general election ballot, we did not intend this as a hollow gesture but as proof the nominee was Constitutionally eligible for the job. And by pretending their Certification as to eligibility-qua-candidacy is all that is required to satisfy state laws, the Democratic Party, both on a state and national level, has perpetrated a fraud on the electorate. ADMINISTRATOR
(Originally posted February 28, 2009)
Most states have enacted laws requiring the candidate for POTUS from the major political Party must be eligible for the job. (For example, the Official Code of GA Annotated (O.C.G.A.), §21-2-5, “Qualifications of candidates for federal and state office; determination of qualifications.” reads: “Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party … shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” Yet the Democratic Party managed to get the name of its candidate onto the general election ballots notwithstanding overwhelming circumstantial evidence shows he is not a natural born citizen (“NBC”).
In order to complete drafting complaints to Attorneys General (“A’sG”) in each state, charging that the executive committee of the state Democratic Party committed fraud by forwarding to the chief elections official in the state – usually the Secretary of State (“S of S”) – their statement that Barack Obama is the official nominee of the Democratic Party for the office of POTUS, so that the state could print his name and or the names of his Electors on the general election ballot, notwithstanding it looks like he is ineligible for the job; I need to see the documents these state party chairs submitted to their state officials. I have already obtained this information for HI; there, the state party merely forwarded under the state party cover letter, a copy of Nancy Pelosi’s “DNC Official Certification of Nomination,” saying Barack Obama was their candidate (and that he was Constitutionally eligible for the job). Presumably, this was the procedure followed in other states, too. But I need to see the documents. That’s where you come in.
I need you to forward a request to your S of S for a copy of the documents, if any, that were provided to that office by the executive committee of the state Democratic Party and were the basis of the state’s decision the Party had satisfied all state requirements to print the name of Barack Obama and/or the names of his Electors on the general election ballot. Most states have public records laws mirroring the federal Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), entitling you to such information, on a timely basis. You could check with your S of S. Requests for records should be made in writing, referencing the public records law in your state.
Let me know what you come up with, ASAP. Thank you.